Previously we examined
some background to the war and noted that the British army as a whole was a
good and professional one. There were of
course differences among the troops.
India was a
difficult climate for white troops who died like flies regardless of whether or
not there was a war on. In the hottest times of the year heat and dust could
impair effectiveness and thirst could even drive men beyond the constraints of
discipline.
The Queen’s
cavalry regiments had a fine sense of their social as well as racial standing
and did perform on the battle field with notable dash.
The Sepoys and
Sowars tended to be better physical specimens than many of their white equivalents. The Company had its pick of the manhood of
India. Soldiering was regarded as an honourable and remunerative occupation by sections of Indian society who had lived by it for generations .
British troops
were tough and could decide to fight to the last man (Gandamack) but they could
also run away (outside the cantonment at Kabul) just like any other soldiers
who think all is lost.
There is also
the quality of the opposition to be considered. In his memoirs a Sepoy wrote
that prior to the Sikh War he was used to giving the enemy a volley or two
and then charging as they began to run away.
The Sikh War
was not like that and of course a British army had recently been lost in
Afghanistan. Therefore it is interesting to note
that the British officer class, and consequently the men, seem to have believed that the Khalsa was
hopelessly suborned by democratic republicanism and therefore no longer could
operate in a disciplined manner. Sidhu
gives us a British eye witness here.
“So confident were our officers and men that
the Sikh army was composed of nothing but a rebel mob, that they did not
believe they would hazard an engagement with us – and I heard several officers
say (even after the cannonading had commenced),’O, they will run away before we
get up to them – they will not fight us’, and several other expressions of
similar kind, showing how very ignorant we were of their real strength and
intentions; and in this ignorance of the Sikh army, it is wonderful that all
were alike involved, even the Governor and the Commander- in- Chief, each of
whom, it should fairly be supposed ought to have been possessed of correct
information on so important a subject.”
With hindsight we can see the Battle of Mudki must have been something of a shock.
My starting
point for an army list (FOB) for the Sikh War is to recognise that the strength of
the British army lay in professionalism, discipline and fire power. As many of
their Indian opponents testified, British command and control, mostly, worked
very well indeed. British fire power,
Afghans in ambush aside, had always prevailed. The soldiers themselves were all
well trained regulars save for bands of irregular cavalry.
I try to
reflect a flavour of the foregoing in the ratings list. As ever if you disagree feel free to amend as
you see fit.
I am rating
(FOB) all Sepoys and Sowars and the majority of other troops simply as regular.
The Queen’s cavalry regiments have the combat capabilities of elite troops but
remain regulars in other respects.
Queen’s infantry regiments have the combat capabilities of regulars but
are otherwise Crack. Ghurkhas and the
Rifles are rated Crack. The idea is to reflect both the self - image and the
reality of the various formations.
A British army for the Sikh War might look like this.
A British army for the Sikh War might look like this.
Unit
|
Armament
|
Combat
Die
|
Defence
Die
|
Short
Range
|
Medium
Range
|
Long
Range
|
80th
|
Musket
|
D8
|
D8
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
31st
|
Musket
|
D12+1
|
D8
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
16th
NI
|
Musket
|
D10
|
D6
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
24th
NI
|
Musket
|
D8
|
D6
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
44th
NI
|
Musket
|
D12
|
D6
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
47th
NI
|
Musket
|
D10
|
D6
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
Ghurkhas
|
Musket
|
D10
|
D8
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-6
|
Rifles
|
Rifle
|
D12
|
D8
|
0-2
|
3-4
|
4-8
|
Unit
|
Armament
|
Combat
Die
|
Defence
Die
|
Short
Range
|
Medium
Range
|
Long
Range
|
5th
Dragoons
|
Carbine
|
D12
|
D6
|
0-1
|
2
|
3
|
Lancers
|
Lance
|
D12+1
|
D6
|
0-1
|
||
Bengal
Light Horse
|
Carbine
|
D8
|
D6
|
0-1
|
2
|
3
|
Light Horse
|
Carbine
|
D10
|
D6
|
0-1
|
2
|
3
|
Unit
|
Armament
|
Combat
Die
|
Defence
Die
|
Short
Range
|
Medium
Range
|
Long
Range
|
HM Foot
Artillery
|
9lb Gun
|
D10
|
D6
|
0-4
|
5-8
|
9-16
|
Company
Foot Artillery
|
9lb Gun
|
D12
|
D6
|
0-4
|
5-8
|
9-16
|
Bengal
Horse Artillery
|
6lb Gun
|
D8
|
D6
|
0-4
|
5-8
|
9-16
|
Bengal
Horse Artillery
|
6lb Gun
|
D10
|
D6
|
0-4
|
5-8
|
9-16
|
Irregulars
Unit
|
Armament
|
Combat
Die
|
Defence
Die
|
Short
Range
|
Medium
Range
|
Long
Range
|
Bengal Irregular
Horse *
|
Mixed
|
D8
|
D6
|
0-1
|
-
|
-
|
Irregular
Horse
|
Mixed
|
D6
|
D6
|
0-1
|
-
|
-
|
The irregular horse in contemporary illustrations are shown
with a variety of arms. I have given them short range fire power here to
reflect a pistols and matchlocks or possibly even bows. The *Bengalis are intended to be the fellows
with razor sharp swords mentioned earlier on this blog.
We can see that the British will enjoy an advantage in
regular infantry firepower. When we
consider the artillery the pendulum swings towards the Sikhs who have heavier
guns. With the cavalry once again the
Sikhs will enjoy an advantage. The
British therefore will have to rely on command and control, discipline and
infantry fire power to carry the day. I
think this is entirely the right effect for gaming the First Anglo Sikh War.
Don't want to be too picky, but I've never seen any evidence of troops from the Madras army in the Sikh wars.
ReplyDeleteYou may well be right Giffy I could have been thinking of the Madras troops who stayed loyal during the Mutiny. I'll check and adjust if need be.
ReplyDeleteThanks Giffy its now corrected.
ReplyDelete